It was also close to the efficiency limitations of powders available at the time given the case capacity of the cartridge.
More likely is the fact that hunters had more confidence in the game-getting ability of heavier 7 mm (.284 150 to 175 grain spitzer-shaped projectiles on big game, as compared to 140 grains being the upper end of pointed.264 gear shop discount code bullets.
Perhaps they jessica simpson signature perfume gift set cant draw jackets long enough for that.Citation needed The introduction of Remington's 7 mm Magnum in 1962 almost immediately eclipsed the.264 Win.In 1958, they necked this big case down to create the.338 Win.They can build one!You might want to order your.264 Win.The result was more sportsmen opting for the bigger Remington 7 mm round because it was seen as more effective on a wider variety of big game; rather than a compromise round that could be used for varmints, worked well on whitetail and mule deer, but.It slipped into a coma in the mid-1960s and has been at deaths door ever since.Shooters should realize that these top muzzle velocities can vary as much as 100 fps from barrel to barrel, rifle to rifle, but this should provide a good basis for comparison.Nobody appeared to turn down the 7mm Rem.Unfortunately, the recoil it generates, plus the expense of the sheer quantity of ammo that may be used to shoot pests at long range (compared to pure varmint cartridges like the.222 Remington and the.220 Swift, or the smaller varmint / deer rounds, like the.243 Winchester).It needs a 1:7 twist or faster.With.5 Creedmoor sending.C.529 bullet at 2,700 fps, you can aim dead-center on a ten-inch target and hit it clear out to 334 yards.
While we are questioning speed, powder consumption, and barrel life, lets address this issue with the.264 Winchester Magnum versus the.5 Creedmoor.
Sierra recently announced an exciting new 150-grain Hollow Point Boat Tail MatchKing.